Hi Tvrtko, On 2023-02-06 at 09:19:02 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 03/02/2023 16:42, Kamil Konieczny wrote: > > Hi Tvrtko, > > > > On 2023-01-31 at 11:32:37 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Rudimentary vendor agnostic example of how lib_igt_drm_clients can be used > > > to display a sorted by card and usage list of processes using GPUs. > > > > > > Borrows a bit of code from intel_gpu_top but for now omits the fancy > > > features like interactive functionality, card selection, client > > > aggregation, sort modes, JSON output and pretty engine names. Also no > > > support for global GPU or system metrics. > > > > > > On the other hand it shows clients from all DRM cards which > > > intel_gpu_top does not do. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > > > I run it with: > > # ./gputop > > > > but it do not work on my Skylake card, I see no output, > > kernel 5.19.0-29-generic, ubuntu 22.10 > > Odd, 5.19 should have the support. Intel_gpu_top works - it is showing the > individual clients? There is no display nor any gpu app running, when I run some igt tests then it does sometimes prints some activity. Intel_gpu_top works and shows headers and zero activity so it mislead me. > > > > > # ./lsgpu > > card0 Intel Skylake (Gen9) drm:/dev/dri/card0 > > └─renderD128 drm:/dev/dri/renderD128 > > > > Please add some options like debug, version, debug with high > > verbose level, help. It seems like q or Q do not exit. > > As the cover letter hints I was only set out to demonstrate an extremely > rudimentary vendor agnostic tool. To quote the cover letter more - "..It > also makes no effort to provide sorting modes, well any interactivity, or > any pretty names for GPUs or engines..". I have no scope presently to make > it better or nicer. > > The tool however can serve as a starting point and people had reported it > working as-is with a few other drivers, AMD, msm and most recently I believe > etnaviv. So perhaps a pool of people to further improve it will be found > there in the future. > > In summary I think it's worth reviewing so that the common code gets > extracted from intel_gpu_top into respective libraries. After that I was > hoping other people start contributing further improvements. > > Regards, > > Tvrtko I agree it is good starting point, it may have something like overall gpu activity, imho something which shows gpu % usage (mem % and power %) for all GPUs present. Regards, Kamil
