Hello Matt,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2023 6:38 AM
> To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar,
> Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Syrjala, Ville <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>; Atwood, Matthew S
> <matthew.s.atwood@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] drm/i915/display: Add 480 MHz CDCLK steps for RPL-U
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 11:06:43AM +0530, Chaitanya Kumar Borah wrote:
> > A new step of 480MHz has been added on SKUs that have a RPL-U device
> > id to support 120Hz displays more efficiently. Use a new quirk to
> > identify the machine for which this change needs to be applied.
> >
> > BSpec: 55409
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah
> <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 23
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index 0c107a38f9d0..a437ac446871 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -1329,6 +1329,27 @@ static const struct intel_cdclk_vals
> adlp_cdclk_table[] = {
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct intel_cdclk_vals rplu_cdclk_table[] = {
> > + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 172800, .divider = 3, .ratio = 27 },
> > + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 20 },
>
> Are we missing an entry for 307.2 MHz here?
>
Ack. Added in new version.
> > + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 50 },
> > + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 58 },
> > + { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 68 },
> > +
> > + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 176000, .divider = 3, .ratio = 22 },
> > + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 16 },
>
> And 312 MHz here?
>
Ack. Added in new version.
> > + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 40 },
> > + { .refclk = 24000, .cdclk = 552000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 46 },
> > + { .refclk = 24400, .cdclk = 648000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 54 },
>
> Typo in refclk here? Actually, it looks like we may have the same typo in the
> ADL-P table as well.
>
Ack. Added in new version. For ADL-P I have created another patch. [1]
>
> > +
> > + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 179200, .divider = 3, .ratio = 14 },
> > + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 192000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 10 },
>
> And missing 307.2 MHz again?
>
Ack. Added in new version.
Regards
Chaitanya
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/518086/
>
> Matt
>
> > + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 480000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 25 },
> > + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 556800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 29 },
> > + { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 652800, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34 },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct intel_cdclk_vals dg2_cdclk_table[] = {
> > { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 163200, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34, .waveform =
> 0x8888 },
> > { .refclk = 38400, .cdclk = 204000, .divider = 2, .ratio = 34,
> > .waveform = 0x9248 }, @@ -3353,6 +3374,8 @@ void
> intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > /* Wa_22011320316:adl-p[a0] */
> > if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> > dev_priv->display.cdclk.table =
> adlp_a_step_cdclk_table;
> > + else if (IS_ADLP_RPLU(dev_priv))
> > + dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = rplu_cdclk_table;
> > else
> > dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = adlp_cdclk_table;
> > } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> --
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> Linux GPU Platform Enablement
> Intel Corporation
