Merged the two patches. Thanks for the review and the patch.
Regards,
Radhakrishna(RK) Sripada
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
> Lisovskiy, Stanislav
> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2023 11:32 PM
> To: Coelho, Luciano <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/i915/mtl: update scaler source and
> destination limits for MTL
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The max source and destination limits for scalers in MTL have changed.
> > Use the new values accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > In v2:
> > * No changes;
> >
> > In v3:
> > * Removed stray reviewed-by tag;
> > * Added my s-o-b.
> >
> > In v4:
> > * No changes.
> >
> > In v5:
> > * Just resent with a cover letter.
> >
> > In v6:
> > * Now the correct version again (same as v4).
> >
> > In v7:
> > * Update to new MTL limits according to the bspec.
> >
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > index d7390067b7d4..01e881293612 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ static u16 skl_scaler_calc_phase(int sub, int scale, bool
> chroma_cosited)
> > #define ICL_MAX_SRC_H 4096
> > #define ICL_MAX_DST_W 5120
> > #define ICL_MAX_DST_H 4096
> > +#define MTL_MAX_SRC_W 4096
> > +#define MTL_MAX_SRC_H 8192
> > +#define MTL_MAX_DST_W 8192
> > +#define MTL_MAX_DST_H 8192
> > #define SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_W 16
> > #define SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_H 16
> >
> > @@ -103,6 +107,8 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> bool force_detach,
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> > &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> > + int min_src_w, min_src_h, min_dst_w, min_dst_h;
> > + int max_src_w, max_src_h, max_dst_w, max_dst_h;
> >
> > /*
> > * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
> > @@ -157,15 +163,33 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + min_src_w = SKL_MIN_SRC_W;
> > + min_src_h = SKL_MIN_SRC_H;
> > + min_dst_w = SKL_MIN_DST_W;
> > + min_dst_h = SKL_MIN_DST_H;
> > +
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > + max_src_w = SKL_MAX_SRC_W;
> > + max_src_h = SKL_MAX_SRC_H;
> > + max_dst_w = SKL_MAX_DST_W;
> > + max_dst_h = SKL_MAX_DST_H;
> > + } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14) {
> > + max_src_w = ICL_MAX_SRC_W;
> > + max_src_h = ICL_MAX_SRC_H;
> > + max_dst_w = ICL_MAX_DST_W;
> > + max_dst_h = ICL_MAX_DST_H;
> > + } else {
> > + max_src_w = MTL_MAX_SRC_W;
> > + max_src_h = MTL_MAX_SRC_H;
> > + max_dst_w = MTL_MAX_DST_W;
> > + max_dst_h = MTL_MAX_DST_H;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* range checks */
> > - if (src_w < SKL_MIN_SRC_W || src_h < SKL_MIN_SRC_H ||
> > - dst_w < SKL_MIN_DST_W || dst_h < SKL_MIN_DST_H ||
> > - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
> > - (src_w > ICL_MAX_SRC_W || src_h > ICL_MAX_SRC_H ||
> > - dst_w > ICL_MAX_DST_W || dst_h > ICL_MAX_DST_H)) ||
> > - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 &&
> > - (src_w > SKL_MAX_SRC_W || src_h > SKL_MAX_SRC_H ||
> > - dst_w > SKL_MAX_DST_W || dst_h > SKL_MAX_DST_H))) {
> > + if (src_w < min_src_w || src_h < min_src_h ||
> > + dst_w < min_dst_w || dst_h < min_dst_h ||
> > + src_w > max_src_w || src_h > max_src_h ||
> > + dst_w > max_dst_w || dst_h > max_dst_h) {
>
> Yep, that looks definitely way cleaner than initial condition.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > "scaler_user index %u.%u: src %ux%u dst %ux%u "
> > "size is out of scaler range\n",
> > --
> > 2.39.0
> >
