On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:46:46AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You killed a BUG in i915_gem_retire_requests_ring, shouldn't that be a WARN or are you in the business of completely killing assertions now :p? > > Yeah, and my little commit message annotation even explained that it's > fully redundant since the move_to_inactive function called on the next > line has the exact same check ;-) Heh, I realized this as I was dozing off last night... "didn't danvet point that out already." Oh well, at least I passed the test. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
