On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:28:06PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:00:14PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > formerly: "drm/i915: Create VMAs (part 5) - move mm_list"
> > > >
> > > > The mm_list is used for the active/inactive LRUs. Since those LRUs are
> > > > per address space, the link should be per VMx .
> > > >
> > > > Because we'll only ever have 1 VMA before this point, it's not incorrect
> > > > to defer this change until this point in the patch series, and doing it
> > > > here makes the change much easier to understand.
> > > >
> > > > Shamelessly manipulated out of Daniel:
> > > > "active/inactive stuff is used by eviction when we run out of address
> > > > space, so needs to be per-vma and per-address space. Bound/unbound otoh
> > > > is used by the shrinker which only cares about the amount of memory used
> > > > and not one bit about in which address space this memory is all used in.
> > > > Of course to actual kick out an object we need to unbind it from every
> > > > address space, but for that we have the per-object list of vmas."
> > > >
> > > > v2: only bump GGTT LRU in i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain (Chris)
> > > >
> > > > v3: Moved earlier in the series
> > > >
> > > > v4: Add dropped message from v3
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Some comments below for this one. The lru changes look a bit strange so
> > > I'll wait for your confirmation that the do_switch hunk has the same
> > > reasons s the one in execbuf with the FIXME comment.
> > > -Daniel
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +--
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 37 +++++++++++----------
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 3 ++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 14 ++++----
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 ++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 37 ++++++++++++---------
> > > > 8 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > index 6d5ca85bd..181e5a6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_list_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > size_t total_obj_size, total_gtt_size;
> > > > int count, ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_list_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > + /* FIXME: the user of this interface might want more than just GGTT */
> > > > switch (list) {
> > > > case ACTIVE_LIST:
> > > > seq_puts(m, "Active:\n");
> > > > @@ -172,12 +173,12 @@ static int i915_gem_object_list_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > total_obj_size = total_gtt_size = count = 0;
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, head, mm_list) {
> > > > - seq_puts(m, " ");
> > > > - describe_obj(m, obj);
> > > > - seq_putc(m, '\n');
> > > > - total_obj_size += obj->base.size;
> > > > - total_gtt_size += i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size(obj);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, head, mm_list) {
> > > > + seq_printf(m, " ");
> > > > + describe_obj(m, vma->obj);
> > > > + seq_printf(m, "\n");
> > > > + total_obj_size += vma->obj->base.size;
> > > > + total_gtt_size += i915_gem_obj_size(vma->obj, vma->vm);
> > >
> > > Why not use vma->node.size? If you don't disagree I'll bikeshed this while
> > > applying.
> > >
> >
> > I think in terms of the diff, it's more logical to do it how I did. The
> > result should damn well be the same though, so go right ahead. When I
> > set about writing the series, I really didn't want to use
> > node.size/start directly as much as possible - so we can sneak things
> > into the helpers as needed.
>
> I've applied this bikeshed, but the patch required some wiggling in and
> conflict resolution. I've checked with your branch and that seems to be
> due to the removel of the inactive list walking to adjust the gpu domains
> in i915_gem_reset. Please check that I didn't botch the patch rebasing
> with your tree.
> -Daniel
>
You killed a BUG in i915_gem_retire_requests_ring, shouldn't that be a WARN or are you in the business of completely killing assertions now :p?
Otherwise, it looks good to me. There are enough diffs because of some
other patches you merged (like watermarks) - that I may have well missed
something in the noise; ie. no promises.
> >
> >
> > > > count++;
> > > > }
> > > > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > @@ -224,7 +225,18 @@ static int per_file_stats(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > +#define count_vmas(list, member) do { \
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, list, member) { \
> > > > + size += i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size(vma->obj); \
> > > > + ++count; \
> > > > + if (vma->obj->map_and_fenceable) { \
> > > > + mappable_size += i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size(vma->obj); \
> > > > + ++mappable_count; \
> > > > + } \
> > > > + } \
> > > > +} while (0)
> > > > +
> > > > +static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void* data)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private;
> > > > struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> > > > @@ -234,6 +246,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > struct drm_file *file;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > @@ -253,12 +266,12 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > > > count, mappable_count, size, mappable_size);
> > > >
> > > > size = count = mappable_size = mappable_count = 0;
> > > > - count_objects(&vm->active_list, mm_list);
> > > > + count_vmas(&vm->active_list, mm_list);
> > > > seq_printf(m, " %u [%u] active objects, %zu [%zu] bytes\n",
> > > > count, mappable_count, size, mappable_size);
> > > >
> > > > size = count = mappable_size = mappable_count = 0;
> > > > - count_objects(&vm->inactive_list, mm_list);
> > > > + count_vmas(&vm->inactive_list, mm_list);
> > > > seq_printf(m, " %u [%u] inactive objects, %zu [%zu] bytes\n",
> > > > count, mappable_count, size, mappable_size);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1771,7 +1784,8 @@ i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val)
> > > > struct drm_device *dev = data;
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> > > > - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma, *x;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Dropping caches: 0x%08llx\n", val);
> > > > @@ -1792,13 +1806,16 @@ i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val)
> > > > i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
> > > >
> > > > if (val & DROP_BOUND) {
> > > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next, &vm->inactive_list,
> > > > - mm_list) {
> > > > - if (obj->pin_count)
> > > > - continue;
> > > > - ret = i915_gem_object_ggtt_unbind(obj);
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > - goto unlock;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link) {
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, x, &vm->inactive_list,
> > > > + mm_list) {
> > >
> > > Imo the double-loop is a bit funny, looping over the global bound list
> > > and skipping all active objects is imo the more straightfoward logic. But
> > > I agree that this is the more straightforward conversion, so I'm ok with a
> > > follow-up fixup patch.
> > >
> >
> > I guess we have a lot of such conversions. I don't really mind the
> > change, just a bit worried that it's less tested than what I've already
> > done. I'm also not yet convinced the result will be a huge improvement
> > for readability, but I've been starting at these lists for so long, my
> > opinion is quite biased.
> >
> > I guess we'll have to see. I've made a note to myself to look into
> > converting all these types of loops over, but as we should see little to
> > no functional impact from the change, I'd like to hold off until we get
> > the rest merged.
> >
> > > > + if (vma->obj->pin_count)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto unlock;
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > index bf1ecef..220699b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > @@ -546,6 +546,9 @@ struct i915_vma {
> > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > >
> > > > + /** This object's place on the active/inactive lists */
> > > > + struct list_head mm_list;
> > > > +
> > > > struct list_head vma_link; /* Link in the object's VMA list */
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1263,9 +1266,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
> > > > struct drm_mm_node *stolen;
> > > > struct list_head global_list;
> > > >
> > > > - /** This object's place on the active/inactive lists */
> > > > struct list_head ring_list;
> > > > - struct list_head mm_list;
> > > > /** This object's place in the batchbuffer or on the eviction list */
> > > > struct list_head exec_list;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > index ec23a5c..fb3f02f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > @@ -1872,7 +1872,6 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > u32 seqno = intel_ring_get_seqno(ring);
> > > >
> > > > BUG_ON(ring == NULL);
> > > > @@ -1888,8 +1887,6 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > obj->active = 1;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - /* Move from whatever list we were on to the tail of execution. */
> > > > - list_move_tail(&obj->mm_list, &vm->active_list);
> > > > list_move_tail(&obj->ring_list, &ring->active_list);
> > > >
> > > > obj->last_read_seqno = seqno;
> > > > @@ -1911,14 +1908,14 @@ i915_gem_object_move_to_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > static void
> > > > i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
> > > > + struct i915_address_space *ggtt_vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma = i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, ggtt_vm);
> > > >
> > > > BUG_ON(obj->base.write_domain & ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
> > > > BUG_ON(!obj->active);
> > > >
> > > > - list_move_tail(&obj->mm_list, &vm->inactive_list);
> > > > + list_move_tail(&vma->mm_list, &ggtt_vm->inactive_list);
> > > >
> > > > list_del_init(&obj->ring_list);
> > > > obj->ring = NULL;
> > > > @@ -2286,9 +2283,9 @@ void i915_gem_restore_fences(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > - struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > > - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> > > > + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> > > > @@ -2298,8 +2295,8 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
> > > > */
> > > > list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link)
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > > - obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > > + vma->obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> > > >
> > > > i915_gem_restore_fences(dev);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -2353,6 +2350,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> > > > if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_read_seqno))
> > > > break;
> > > >
> > > > + BUG_ON(!obj->active);
> > > > i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -2635,7 +2633,6 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
> > > > i915_gem_gtt_finish_object(obj);
> > > > i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> > > >
> > > > - list_del(&obj->mm_list);
> > > > /* Avoid an unnecessary call to unbind on rebind. */
> > > > if (i915_is_ggtt(vma->vm))
> > > > obj->map_and_fenceable = true;
> > > > @@ -3180,7 +3177,7 @@ search_free:
> > > > goto err_out;
> > > >
> > > > list_move_tail(&obj->global_list, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
> > > > - list_add_tail(&obj->mm_list, &vm->inactive_list);
> > > > + list_add_tail(&vma->mm_list, &vm->inactive_list);
> > > >
> > > > /* Keep GGTT vmas first to make debug easier */
> > > > if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
> > > > @@ -3342,9 +3339,14 @@ i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool write)
> > > > old_write_domain);
> > > >
> > > > /* And bump the LRU for this access */
> > > > - if (i915_gem_object_is_inactive(obj))
> > > > - list_move_tail(&obj->mm_list,
> > > > - &dev_priv->gtt.base.inactive_list);
> > > > + if (i915_gem_object_is_inactive(obj)) {
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma = i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj,
> > > > + &dev_priv->gtt.base);
> > > > + if (vma)
> > > > + list_move_tail(&vma->mm_list,
> > > > + &dev_priv->gtt.base.inactive_list);
> > > > +
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -3917,7 +3919,6 @@ unlock:
> > > > void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops)
> > > > {
> > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->mm_list);
> > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->global_list);
> > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->ring_list);
> > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->exec_list);
> > > > @@ -4054,6 +4055,7 @@ struct i915_vma *i915_gem_vma_create(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > >
> > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->vma_link);
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->mm_list);
> > > > vma->vm = vm;
> > > > vma->obj = obj;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -4063,6 +4065,7 @@ struct i915_vma *i915_gem_vma_create(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > > void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
> > > > {
> > > > list_del_init(&vma->vma_link);
> > > > + list_del(&vma->mm_list);
> > > > drm_mm_remove_node(&vma->node);
> > > > kfree(vma);
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > > > index d1cb28c..88b0f52 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > > > @@ -436,7 +436,10 @@ static int do_switch(struct i915_hw_context *to)
> > > > * MI_SET_CONTEXT instead of when the next seqno has completed.
> > > > */
> > > > if (from != NULL) {
> > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = from->obj->base.dev->dev_private;
> > > > + struct i915_address_space *ggtt = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > from->obj->base.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> > > > + list_move_tail(&i915_gem_obj_to_vma(from->obj, ggtt)->mm_list, &ggtt->active_list);
> > >
> > > I don't really see a reason to add this here ... shouldn't move_to_active
> > > take care of this? Obviously not in this patch here but later on when it's
> > > converted over.
> >
> > Yes. You're right - it's sort of an ugly intermediate artifact.
> >
> > >
> > > > i915_gem_object_move_to_active(from->obj, ring);
> > > > /* As long as MI_SET_CONTEXT is serializing, ie. it flushes the
> > > > * whole damn pipeline, we don't need to explicitly mark the
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > > index 61bf5e2..425939b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > > > @@ -87,8 +87,7 @@ i915_gem_evict_something(struct drm_device *dev, struct i915_address_space *vm,
> > > > drm_mm_init_scan(&vm->mm, min_size, alignment, cache_level);
> > > >
> > > > /* First see if there is a large enough contiguous idle region... */
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list) {
> > > > - struct i915_vma *vma = i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, vm);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list) {
> > > > if (mark_free(vma, &unwind_list))
> > > > goto found;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -97,8 +96,7 @@ i915_gem_evict_something(struct drm_device *dev, struct i915_address_space *vm,
> > > > goto none;
> > > >
> > > > /* Now merge in the soon-to-be-expired objects... */
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->active_list, mm_list) {
> > > > - struct i915_vma *vma = i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, vm);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->active_list, mm_list) {
> > > > if (mark_free(vma, &unwind_list))
> > > > goto found;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -159,7 +157,7 @@ i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > > struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > > - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
> > > > bool lists_empty = true;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -187,9 +185,9 @@ i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >
> > > > /* Having flushed everything, unbind() should never raise an error */
> > > > list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link) {
> > > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > > - if (obj->pin_count == 0)
> > > > - WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, vm)));
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > > + if (vma->obj->pin_count == 0)
> > > > + WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > > > index 64dc6b5..0f21702 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> > > > @@ -801,6 +801,8 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *objects,
> > > > obj->base.read_domains = obj->base.pending_read_domains;
> > > > obj->fenced_gpu_access = obj->pending_fenced_gpu_access;
> > > >
> > > > + /* FIXME: This lookup gets fixed later <-- danvet */
> > > > + list_move_tail(&i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, vm)->mm_list, &vm->active_list);
> > >
> > > Ah, I guess the same comment applies to the lru frobbing in do_switch?
> > >
> > > > i915_gem_object_move_to_active(obj, ring);
> > > > if (obj->base.write_domain) {
> > > > obj->dirty = 1;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> > > > index 000ffbd..fa60103 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> > > > @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > > obj->has_global_gtt_mapping = 1;
> > > >
> > > > list_add_tail(&obj->global_list, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
> > > > - list_add_tail(&obj->mm_list, &ggtt->inactive_list);
> > > > + list_add_tail(&vma->mm_list, &ggtt->inactive_list);
> > > >
> > > > return obj;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > index d970d84..9623a4e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > @@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ static void capture_bo(struct drm_i915_error_buffer *err,
> > > > static u32 capture_active_bo(struct drm_i915_error_buffer *err,
> > > > int count, struct list_head *head)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > int i = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, head, mm_list) {
> > > > - capture_bo(err++, obj);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, head, mm_list) {
> > > > + capture_bo(err++, vma->obj);
> > > > if (++i == count)
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -622,7 +622,8 @@ static struct drm_i915_error_object *
> > > > i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > u32 seqno;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -642,20 +643,23 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring, false);
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->active_list, mm_list) {
> > > > - if (obj->ring != ring)
> > > > - continue;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link) {
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->active_list, mm_list) {
> > >
> > > We could instead loop over the bound list and check for ->active. But this
> > > is ok, too albeit a bit convoluted imo.
> > >
> > > > + obj = vma->obj;
> > > > + if (obj->ring != ring)
> > > > + continue;
> > > >
> > > > - if (i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_read_seqno))
> > > > - continue;
> > > > + if (i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_read_seqno))
> > > > + continue;
> > > >
> > > > - if ((obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_COMMAND) == 0)
> > > > - continue;
> > > > + if ((obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_COMMAND) == 0)
> > > > + continue;
> > > >
> > > > - /* We need to copy these to an anonymous buffer as the simplest
> > > > - * method to avoid being overwritten by userspace.
> > > > - */
> > > > - return i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, obj);
> > > > + /* We need to copy these to an anonymous buffer as the simplest
> > > > + * method to avoid being overwritten by userspace.
> > > > + */
> > > > + return i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, obj);
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > @@ -775,11 +779,12 @@ static void i915_gem_capture_buffers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > struct drm_i915_error_state *error)
> > > > {
> > > > struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > > + struct i915_vma *vma;
> > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > i = 0;
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->active_list, mm_list)
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->active_list, mm_list)
> > > > i++;
> > > > error->active_bo_count = i;
> > > > list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list, global_list)
> > --
> > Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
