On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:15:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:44:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:30:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > I was curious as to what objects were currently allocated from stolen > > > memory, and so exported it from debugfs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I liike this, but since I've just merged Ben's exec_list vma conversion it > > doesn't apply any more cleanly. Can you please rebase and resend? > > It applies cleanly to current -nightly. Or at least the local > approximation thereof. I've gotten ahead of myself here, it applies cleanly. But it'll fail once patch 25 is in from Ben. Otoh that one has review outstanding, so I think it's the one to give in. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
