On 12/23/2022 7:37 PM, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 12/23/2022 6:35 PM, Luca Coelho wrote:
From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
The max source and destination limits for scalers in MTL have changed.
Use the new values accordingly.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
---
In v2:
* No changes;
In v3:
* Removed stray reviewed-by tag;
* Added my s-o-b.
In v4:
* No changes.
In v5:
* Just resent with a cover letter.
In v6:
* Now the correct version again (same as v4).
In v7:
* Update to new MTL limits according to the bspec.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
index d7390067b7d4..01e881293612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ static u16 skl_scaler_calc_phase(int sub, int
scale, bool chroma_cosited)
#define ICL_MAX_SRC_H 4096
#define ICL_MAX_DST_W 5120
#define ICL_MAX_DST_H 4096
+#define MTL_MAX_SRC_W 4096
+#define MTL_MAX_SRC_H 8192
+#define MTL_MAX_DST_W 8192
+#define MTL_MAX_DST_H 8192
#define SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_W 16
#define SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_H 16
@@ -103,6 +107,8 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state
*crtc_state, bool force_detach,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
+ int min_src_w, min_src_h, min_dst_w, min_dst_h;
+ int max_src_w, max_src_h, max_dst_w, max_dst_h;
/*
* Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
@@ -157,15 +163,33 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state
*crtc_state, bool force_detach,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ min_src_w = SKL_MIN_SRC_W;
+ min_src_h = SKL_MIN_SRC_H;
+ min_dst_w = SKL_MIN_DST_W;
+ min_dst_h = SKL_MIN_DST_H;
+
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
+ max_src_w = SKL_MAX_SRC_W;
+ max_src_h = SKL_MAX_SRC_H;
+ max_dst_w = SKL_MAX_DST_W;
+ max_dst_h = SKL_MAX_DST_H;
+ } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14) {
+ max_src_w = ICL_MAX_SRC_W;
+ max_src_h = ICL_MAX_SRC_H;
+ max_dst_w = ICL_MAX_DST_W;
+ max_dst_h = ICL_MAX_DST_H;
Hi Luca,
Recently there is a change in Bspec:50441 and now for Gen 12 scalers,
the MAX_SRC_W is 5120 pixels and MAX_SRC_H is 8192.
Slight correction : this is for both Gen12,and 13.
Regards,
Ankit
MAX_DST_W, and MAX_DST_H are 8192.
As we are refactoring this part, can we include a separate patch for
Gen 12 in this series?
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
+ } else {
+ max_src_w = MTL_MAX_SRC_W;
+ max_src_h = MTL_MAX_SRC_H;
+ max_dst_w = MTL_MAX_DST_W;
+ max_dst_h = MTL_MAX_DST_H;
+ }
+
/* range checks */
- if (src_w < SKL_MIN_SRC_W || src_h < SKL_MIN_SRC_H ||
- dst_w < SKL_MIN_DST_W || dst_h < SKL_MIN_DST_H ||
- (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
- (src_w > ICL_MAX_SRC_W || src_h > ICL_MAX_SRC_H ||
- dst_w > ICL_MAX_DST_W || dst_h > ICL_MAX_DST_H)) ||
- (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 &&
- (src_w > SKL_MAX_SRC_W || src_h > SKL_MAX_SRC_H ||
- dst_w > SKL_MAX_DST_W || dst_h > SKL_MAX_DST_H))) {
+ if (src_w < min_src_w || src_h < min_src_h ||
+ dst_w < min_dst_w || dst_h < min_dst_h ||
+ src_w > max_src_w || src_h > max_src_h ||
+ dst_w > max_dst_w || dst_h > max_dst_h) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"scaler_user index %u.%u: src %ux%u dst %ux%u "
"size is out of scaler range\n",
