Re: Possible regression in drm/i915 driver: memleak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

On 20/12/2022 15:22, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
+Added DRM mailing list and maintainers

On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 15:33 +0100, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
Hi all,

I have been unsuccessful to find any particular Intel i915 maintainer
emails, so my best bet is to post here, as you will must assuredly
already know them.

For future reference you can use ${kernel_dir}/scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f ...

The problem is a kernel memory leak that is repeatedly occurring
triggered during the execution of Chrome browser under the latest
6.1.0+
kernel of this morning and Almalinux 8.6 on a Lenovo desktop box
with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz CPU.

The build is with KMEMLEAK, KASAN and MGLRU turned on during the
build,
on a vanilla mainline kernel from Mr. Torvalds' tree.

The leaks look like this one:

unreferenced object 0xffff888131754880 (size 64):
    comm "chrome", pid 13058, jiffies 4298568878 (age 3708.084s)
    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
      01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
................
      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1e 3e 83 88 ff ff
...........>....
    backtrace:
      [<ffffffff9e9b5542>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb2/0x340
      [<ffffffff9e9bbf5f>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1bf/0x2c0
      [<ffffffff9e8f767a>] kmalloc_trace+0x2a/0xb0
      [<ffffffffc08dfde5>] drm_vma_node_allow+0x45/0x150 [drm]
      [<ffffffffc0b33315>] __assign_mmap_offset_handle+0x615/0x820
[i915]
      [<ffffffffc0b34057>] i915_gem_mmap_offset_ioctl+0x77/0x110
[i915]
      [<ffffffffc08bc5e1>] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x181/0x280 [drm]
      [<ffffffffc08bc9cd>] drm_ioctl+0x2dd/0x6a0 [drm]
      [<ffffffff9ea54744>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc4/0x100
      [<ffffffff9fbc0178>] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
      [<ffffffff9fc000aa>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc

The complete list of leaks in attachment, but they seem similar or
the same.

Please find attached lshw and kernel build config file.

I will probably check the same parms on my laptop at home, which is
also
Lenovo, but a different hw config and Ubuntu 22.10.

Could you try the below patch?

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index c3ea243d414d..0b07534c203a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -679,9 +679,10 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 insert:
        mmo = insert_mmo(obj, mmo);
        GEM_BUG_ON(lookup_mmo(obj, mmap_type) != mmo);
-out:
+
        if (file)
                drm_vma_node_allow(&mmo->vma_node, file);
+out:
        return mmo;

 err:

Maybe it is not the best fix but curious to know if it will make the leak go away.

Regards,

Tvrtko



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux