On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 21:06 -0800, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote: > > On 12/5/2022 4:03 PM, Alan Previn wrote: Alan:[snip] > > @@ -39,18 +45,26 @@ > > * performed via the mei_pxp component module. > > */ > > > > -struct intel_gt *pxp_to_gt(const struct intel_pxp *pxp) > > +bool intel_pxp_is_supported(const struct intel_pxp *pxp) > > { > > - return container_of(pxp, struct intel_gt, pxp); > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_PXP)) > > + return false; > > + else if (!pxp) > > + return false; > > nit: this could be squashed in a single line: > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_PXP) || !pxp) > > not a blocker > > > + return (INTEL_INFO(pxp->ctrl_gt->i915)->has_pxp && VDBOX_MASK(pxp->ctrl_gt)); > > } > > > > bool intel_pxp_is_enabled(const struct intel_pxp *pxp) > > { > > + if (!pxp) > > + return false; > > return pxp->ce; > > nit: this can be squashed as: > > return pxp && pxp->ce; > > same for the is_active below. not a blocker > > > } > > > > bool intel_pxp_is_active(const struct intel_pxp *pxp) > > { > > + if (!pxp) > > + return false; > > return pxp->arb_is_valid; > > } > > > > Alan: okay - will handle some of these nits since i need to re-rev anyway Alan:[snip] > > > This comment doesn't really explain why we exclude the case with > media_gt. I would have preferred a line to explain that the module only > works for pre-media_gt platforms. not a blocker. > Alan: Okay will add a comment. Alan:[snip] > > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ > > > > int intel_pxp_huc_load_and_auth(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > > { > > - struct intel_gt *gt = pxp_to_gt(pxp); > > + struct intel_gt *gt = pxp->ctrl_gt; > > This is called from outside the PXP code, so we need to check the pxp > pointer before de-referencing it (see also pxp->pxp_component further > down this function). It does look like the stack it's kind of circular > so it should be safe (pxp bind -> huc load -> this function), but IMO > better stick to the rule that all functions called from outside need a > check. > > With this fixed: > > Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > Alan:Thanks will do - will respin rev10 Alan:[snip]