On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 03:24:47PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:00:06PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > Simply iterating over 1 inactive list is insufficient for the way we now
> > > track inactive (1 list per address space). We could alternatively do
> > > this with bound + unbound lists, and an inactive check. To me, this way
> > > is a bit easier to understand.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 7 ++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > index b4c35f0..8ce3545 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > @@ -2282,7 +2282,7 @@ void i915_gem_restore_fences(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> > > + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> > > int i;
> > > @@ -2293,8 +2293,9 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > /* Move everything out of the GPU domains to ensure we do any
> > > * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
> > > */
> > > - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > - obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> > > + list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link)
> > > + list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> > > + obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> >
> > This code is dead. Just remove it rather than port it to vma.
> > -Chris
> >
> > --
> > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>
> Got it, and moved to the front of the series.
>
> commit 8472f08863da69159aa0a7555836ca0511754877
> Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat Aug 3 15:22:17 2013 -0700
>
> drm/i915: eliminate dead domain clearing on reset
>
> The code itself is no longer accurate without updating once we have
> multiple address space since clearing the domains of every object
> requires scanning the inactive list for all VMs.
>
> "This code is dead. Just remove it rather than port it to vma." - Chris
> Wilson
>
> Recommended-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
That's not a properly formatted patch, so I've stopped merging for now.
/me loves cheap excuses
But overall I _really_ like what the series looks now, I can dwell in the
cozy feeling that I actually understand what's going on. So if the name of
the game is to keep your maintainer happy I think the goal is unlocked ;-)
Cheers, Daniel
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 3a5d4ba..c7e3cee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2277,12 +2277,6 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(dev_priv, ring);
>
> - /* Move everything out of the GPU domains to ensure we do any
> - * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
> - */
> - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> - obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> -
> i915_gem_restore_fences(dev);
> }
>
>
>
> --
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
