On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:00:06PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Simply iterating over 1 inactive list is insufficient for the way we now
> track inactive (1 list per address space). We could alternatively do
> this with bound + unbound lists, and an inactive check. To me, this way
> is a bit easier to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index b4c35f0..8ce3545 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2282,7 +2282,7 @@ void i915_gem_restore_fences(struct drm_device *dev)
> void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> int i;
> @@ -2293,8 +2293,9 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> /* Move everything out of the GPU domains to ensure we do any
> * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
> */
> - list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> - obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
> + list_for_each_entry(vm, &dev_priv->vm_list, global_link)
> + list_for_each_entry(obj, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list)
> + obj->base.read_domains &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
This code is dead. Just remove it rather than port it to vma.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
