> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:51:17AM +0200, Alexander Usyskin wrote: > > From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > For multi-tile setups the GSC operational only on the tile 0. > > Skip GSC auxiliary device creation for all other tiles. > > > > Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c > > index 2e796ffad911..92ad8cd45ddb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c > > @@ -456,7 +456,10 @@ void intel_gt_chipset_flush(struct intel_gt *gt) > > > > void intel_gt_driver_register(struct intel_gt *gt) { > > - intel_gsc_init(>->gsc, gt->i915); > > + if (gt->info.id == 0) > > + intel_gsc_init(>->gsc, gt->i915); > > + else > > + drm_dbg(>->i915->drm, "Not initializing gsc for remote > tiles\n"); > > It looks to me that we need to move the gsc out of the intel_gt instead of > workaround the initialization. The interrupts are handled by gt, so where this should go ?