On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726: >> >> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915 >> + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file >> + drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT >> + drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants >> + drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections >> inside GT access >> + drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional >> + drm/i915: fix the racy object accounting >> + drm/i915: dvo_ch7xxx: fix vsync polarity setting >> + drm/i915: initialize gt_lock early with other spin locks >> + Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware >> expects Windows 8" >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 + >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 2 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 836 +-- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 91 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 292 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 413 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 411 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 1347 ++--- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 16 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1065 ++-- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 36 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 431 +- >> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 595 +++ >> >> Any hints which of the commits could be culprit? > > None, it's the vma offset manager stuff in drm-next. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c > index 3613b50..1f76572 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c > @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ int drm_gem_mmap(struct file *filp, struct > vm_area_struct *vma) > } > > obj = container_of(node, struct drm_gem_object, vma_node); > - ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node), vma); > + ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node) << PAGE_SHIFT, vma); > > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > > That should fix stuff up again, David Herrmann is working on a real > patch already. > The fix can be found at [1]. - Sedat - [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833932/ > Cheers, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
