On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > ... >>>> > ... but does not start as well, so it seems to be a kernel-issue as >>>> > assumed (2nd confirmation). >>>> > >>>> > X.log attached. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Now, really w/ promised attachment. >>> >>> Yes, same failure (GTT mmaps) but at a later point, and UXA has no >>> fallback plan. >> >> I'm running igt on my machines here to prep a new -next test cycle, >> and gtt mmaps seem to fail across the board :( Currently I'd wager >> that the vma offset manager is the culprit, since I've only recently >> pulled that stuff in from drm-next. > > So, I resetted next-20130726 to the merge-commit of > drm-intel/for-linux-next, which is as expected bad. > > First, I looked w/ a Grrr at i915_gem_stolen.c with a focus on > "drm/i915: Use Graphics Base of Stolen Memory on all gen3+", but this > commit is also in next-20130725. > > Yeah, might be the stuff comes from the merge including vma stuff. > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c?id=4867509d9269228f69273312298fea11f414ae54 > I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726: $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915 + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file + drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT + drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants + drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections inside GT access + drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional + drm/i915: fix the racy object accounting + drm/i915: dvo_ch7xxx: fix vsync polarity setting + drm/i915: initialize gt_lock early with other spin locks + Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8" + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 + + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 2 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 836 +-- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 91 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 292 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 413 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 411 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 1347 ++--- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 16 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1065 ++-- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 36 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 431 +- + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 595 +++ Any hints which of the commits could be culprit? - Sedat - > - Sedat - > >> -Daniel >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
