On 11/10/2022 11:13, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:48:44PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
drm_device pointers are unwelcome.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Only this first patch is strictly related to display, I'm taking
the series in intel-gt-next. Anyone against?
Absolutely against. That logic is backwards.
drm-intel-gt-next is for stuff that's strictly about gt/gem. Everything
else, especially stuff touching common code, needs to go through
drm-intel-next.
There's nothing here that's gt/gem specific.
Glanced over the series and although there are a few bits which are not
about display, it does seem majority is either display or common code so
I agree it should all go in via drm-intel-next.
Regards,
Tvrtko
