On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:03:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > We can't have a .remove callback that does nothing, this breaks > removing the device while it's in use. Once we have the > vfio_unregister_group_dev() fix below, we'll block until the device is > unused, at which point vgpu->attached becomes false. Unless I'm > missing something, I think we should also follow-up with a patch to > remove that bogus warn-on branch, right? Thanks, Yes, looks right to me. I question all the logical arround attached, where is the locking? Jason
