Re: [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Split up intel_color_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> intel_color_init() does both device level and crtc level stuff.
>> Split it up accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c   | 15 +++++++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h   |  4 +++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c    |  3 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  1 +
>>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> index bbc56affb3ec..ddfe7c257a72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> @@ -2206,13 +2206,21 @@ static const struct intel_color_funcs ilk_color_funcs = {
>>  	.read_luts = ilk_read_luts,
>>  };
>>  
>> -void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> +void intel_crtc_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>  	bool has_ctm = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size != 0;
>>  
>>  	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&crtc->base, 256);
>>  
>> +	drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(&crtc->base,
>> +				   INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size,
>> +				   has_ctm,
>> +				   INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.gamma_lut_size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_color_init_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>>  	if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>>  		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>>  			dev_priv->display.funcs.color = &chv_color_funcs;
>> @@ -2238,9 +2246,4 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>  		} else
>>  			dev_priv->display.funcs.color = &ilk_color_funcs;
>>  	}
>> -
>> -	drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(&crtc->base,
>> -				   INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size,
>> -				   has_ctm,
>> -				   INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.gamma_lut_size);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> index fd873425e082..67702451e2fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@
>>  
>>  struct intel_crtc_state;
>>  struct intel_crtc;
>> +struct drm_i915_private;
>>  struct drm_property_blob;
>>  
>> -void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> +void intel_color_init_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +void intel_crtc_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>>  int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  void intel_color_commit_noarm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  void intel_color_commit_arm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> index 6792a9056f46..2d9fc7383bfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> @@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ int intel_crtc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>>  						BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_DEFAULT) |
>>  						BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR));
>>  
>> -	intel_color_init(crtc);
>> -
>> +	intel_crtc_color_init(crtc);
>>  	intel_crtc_drrs_init(crtc);
>>  	intel_crtc_crc_init(crtc);
>
> I'd name all of these like:
>
> 	intel_color_crtc_init();
>         intel_drrs_crtc_init();
>         intel_crc_crtc_init();
>
> I think in gem side the "name functions based on first/context argument"
> style has lead to serious problems wrt code organization. They still
> stick to it, but I can't make heads or tails where function definitions
> or declarations are supposed to be placed or found.

The patch itself is fine, and follows the precedent set by the above
functions, but I'd *really* like to see all the above functions renamed
afterwards.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index eb8eaeb19881..a103413cb081 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -8326,6 +8326,7 @@ void intel_init_display_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> +	intel_color_init_hooks(dev_priv);
>>  	intel_init_cdclk_hooks(dev_priv);
>>  	intel_audio_hooks_init(dev_priv);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux