On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:36:46PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:51:16AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:18:55AM +0300, Luca Coelho wrote: >> > >> On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 19:52 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: >> > >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > >> > >> > If pipe B is fused off we also shouldn't have FBC B. >> > >> > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 1 + >> > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c >> > >> > index 1434dc33cf49..fbefebc023f1 100644 >> > >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c >> > >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c >> > >> > @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> > >> > if (dfsm & SKL_DFSM_PIPE_B_DISABLE) { >> > >> > runtime->pipe_mask &= ~BIT(PIPE_B); >> > >> > runtime->cpu_transcoder_mask &= ~BIT(TRANSCODER_B); >> > >> > + runtime->fbc_mask &= ~BIT(INTEL_FBC_B); >> > >> > } >> > >> > if (dfsm & SKL_DFSM_PIPE_C_DISABLE) { >> > >> > runtime->pipe_mask &= ~BIT(PIPE_C); >> > >> >> > >> I don't know (yet) what exactly this does, but it makes sense if you >> > >> think of consistency: we already do that for PIPE_A. >> > > >> > > It's basically saying the entire pipe is fused off, so anything >> > > living inside that pipe should also be fused off. >> > > >> > >> >> > >> But what about PIPE_C and PIPE_D? Wouldn't it make sense to do the same >> > >> thing for them as well? >> > > >> > > There is no FBC engine on those pipes (we don't even have >> > > the INTEL_FBC_C+ enum values defined), at least for now. >> > >> > A future proof way would be to add >> > >> > runtime->fbc_mask &= runtime->pipe_mask; >> >> Dunno if I entirely like the extra assumption that the enums match. > > Well, I guess I already did that partially in eg. skl_fbc_id_for_pipe() > though that one does allow for a difference in bias at least. Regardless, scratch what I just said, I don't like it either. For whatever reason I momentarily thought fbc_mask was indexed using pipes. *facepalm*. Sorry for the noise. BR, Jani. > >> Also would need to make sure we don't accidentally screw up any >> old platforms where FBC is not tied to a specific pipe, but I >> guess we should never have pipe A fused off on those w/o >> the entire display engine fused off as well. >> >> > >> > after all the fuse handling. Would also fix any misconfiguration in >> > i915_pci.c. >> > >> > >> > BR, >> > Jani. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center >> >> -- >> Ville Syrjälä >> Intel -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center