From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Start to clean up the mess around DPLL IDs a bit by removing the nasty assumption that the index of the DPLL in the arrays matches its ID. Fortunately we did have a WARN i nthere to cathc mistakes, but better to not has such silly assumptions i nthe first place. There's still a lot of mess left since the DPLL IDs in the hardware are a mess as well. Eg. the index of the register instance often differs from the index used to select the DPLL in clock routing thing. So we could probably clean up more of that, perhaps by declaring separate IDs for each PLL for each use case... Ville Syrjälä (4): drm/i915: Always initialize dpll.lock drm/i915: Nuke intel_get_shared_dpll_id() drm/i915: Stop requiring PLL index == PLL ID drm/i915: Decouple I915_NUM_PLLS from PLL IDs drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 105 +++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 3 - .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c | 5 +- 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) -- 2.35.1
