On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:29:55AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote: > > > > On 9/8/2022 5:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote: > > >> Hi Ville, > > >> > > >> > > >> I fixed a similar issue in DII but I couldn't reproduce it in drm > > >> > > >> http://intel-gfx-pw.fi.intel.com/patch/228850/?series=15910&rev=2. > > >> > > >> I wonder if that fixes the problem you are facing then I can send that > > >> to drm. > > > CI can tell you. It has been complaining about this for ages > > > > > > Could you please share a url/failed test name. I must be searching the > > wrong hw/test(https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-ivb-3770.html). > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12102/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > gen3 hits it nearly 100% of the time in the live selftests. > IIRC it also looked like shard-snb has also hit it more > sporadically in some tests. > > There's also at least one bug about it > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4528 > which I guess is why ci is able to ignore this, and that > then has enabled all the humans to ignore it as well. Did we get anywhere with this? I'm getting tired of seeing the red in CI. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
