Re: [PATCH] Revert "HAX iommu/intel: Ignore igfx_off"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15/09/2022 09:09, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 08:53:16AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 14/09/2022 21:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
This reverts commit 58f44e349cfc10a4f2208fd806829c8fd046480b.

To be removed from the topic/core-for-CI branch. If CI's config is
setting that, it just shouldn't do it. Looking at a random current CI
execution, the command line is:

Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/drm_intel root=/dev/nvme0n1p2 \
    rootwait fsck.repair=yes nmi_watchdog=panic,auto panic=5 \
    softdog.soft_panic=5 drm.debug=0xe log_buf_len=1M trace_clock=global 3 \
    modprobe.blacklist=i915,snd_hda_intel ro

So it should be safe to remove this commit.

It's a patch which can silently bite so no complaints from me to remove it - just please upgrade the check from a "random current CI execution" to something stronger. Ack from CI folks would do.

Well in the commit message I mentioned "To be removed from the
topic/core-for-CI branch". This is how the topic/core-for-CI branch is handled until now. We simply remove the commit and force push.  So there won't be any
trace of commit messages for me to write anything stronger.

To be at least registered in the mailing list what I used (no it was not this,
but linking to the execution for this specific patch serves the purpose):

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108575v1/bat-dg2-8/boot0.txt

<5>[    0.000000] Linux version 6.0.0-rc5-Patchwork_108575v1-g37b0cd34584f+ (kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc (Ubuntu 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04) 8.4.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.30) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Sep 14 23:50:09 EEST 2022 <6>[    0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/drm_intel root=/dev/nvme0n1p2 rootwait fsck.repair=yes nmi_watchdog=panic,auto panic=5 softdog.soft_panic=5 drm.debug=0xe log_buf_len=1M trace_clock=global 3 modprobe.blacklist=i915,snd_hda_intel ro


Petri already acked this from the CI side via IRC today.

That's all I suggested. :)

Regards,

Tvrtko



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux