On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 19:22 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:59:54AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Hi Dave and Daniel,
> >
> > A few fixes, but most targeting stable.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Ville Syrjälä (2):
> > drm/i915: Implement WaEdpLinkRateDataReload
>
> Don't you need to revert d5929835080a60f9119d024fa42f315913942f76 in
> order for "drm/i915: Implement WaEdpLinkRateDataReload" to actually
> be
> useful/interesting? Otherwise, what's the point?
Unfortunately there was no clear indication on the revert patch for
the tool to pick, and I hadn't followed that front myself closely.
Should
483e3d87a37e ("Revert "drm/i915/display: Re-add check for low voltage
sku for max dp source rate"")
have a Fixes tag?
Or should dim consider all reverts as Fixes?
Anyway, I will cherry pick this to our fixes branch for propagation
this week.
Thanks for the heads up,
Rodrigo.
>
> Regards,
> Jason
