On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We don't parse the VBT vswing/preemphassis tables at all currently.
> Let's WARN if a port wants to use them so we get a heads up that
> whether we really need to implement this stuff or not. My
> current stash contains no VBTs with this bit set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 51dde5bfd956..cd86b65055ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -2661,6 +2661,10 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
> return;
> }
>
> + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, child->use_vbt_vswing,
> + "Port %c asks to use VBT vswing/preemph tables\n",
> + port_name(port));
> +
I was hoping to clean parse_ddi_port() of all this kind of informative
stuff and shove it to print_ddi_port().
BR,
Jani.
> if (i915->vbt.ports[port]) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> "More than one child device for port %c in VBT, using the first.\n",
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
