Re: [PATCH 24/39] drm/i915: move mipi_mmio_base to display.dsi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:00:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:07:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
Move display related members under drm_i915_private display sub-struct.

Prefer adding anonymous sub-structs even for single members that aren't
our own structs.

Abstract mmio base member access in register definitions in a macro.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h |   5 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c        |   4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h   | 188 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   3 -
4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
index 533c2e3a6685..db1ba379797e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ struct intel_display {
		unsigned int max_cdclk_freq;
	} cdclk;

+	struct {
+		/* VLV/CHV/BXT/GLK DSI MMIO register base address */

this is already outdated, so maybe remove the platforms from the
comment?

What did I miss? It's only used for vlv_dsi, not icl_dsi which is the
newer thing.

you missed that I misread this part. It's the icl_dsi that is used
later.




+		u32 mmio_base;
+	} dsi;
+
	struct {
		/* list of fbdev register on this device */
		struct intel_fbdev *fbdev;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
index b9b1fed99874..9651a1f00587 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
@@ -1872,9 +1872,9 @@ void vlv_dsi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
		return;

	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
-		dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = BXT_MIPI_BASE;
+		dev_priv->display.dsi.mmio_base = BXT_MIPI_BASE;
	else
-		dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;
+		dev_priv->display.dsi.mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;

	intel_dsi = kzalloc(sizeof(*intel_dsi), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!intel_dsi)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
index 356e51515346..e065b8f2ee08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#define VLV_MIPI_BASE			VLV_DISPLAY_BASE
#define BXT_MIPI_BASE			0x60000

+#define _MIPI_MMIO_BASE(__i915) ((__i915)->display.dsi.mmio_base)
+
#define _MIPI_PORT(port, a, c)	(((port) == PORT_A) ? a : c)	/* ports A and C only */
#define _MMIO_MIPI(port, a, c)	_MMIO(_MIPI_PORT(port, a, c))

@@ -96,8 +98,8 @@

/* MIPI DSI Controller and D-PHY registers */

-#define _MIPIA_DEVICE_READY		(dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base + 0xb000)
-#define _MIPIC_DEVICE_READY		(dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base + 0xb800)
+#define _MIPIA_DEVICE_READY		(_MIPI_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0xb000)

ugh, and I thought we wouldn't have so many implicit params anymore.
Mind adding a "TODO: remove implicit dev_priv parameter" ?

It's been on my private todo list like 10 years. :(

and we are finally removing that from the todo list soon. right? :)

Lucas De Marchi


BR,
Jani.




Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>


Lucas De Marchi

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux