> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 12:21 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/39] drm/i915: move clock_gating_funcs to
> display.funcs
>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
> >>> Of Jani Nikula
> >>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 8:37 PM
> >>> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; De Marchi, Lucas
> >>> <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH 05/39] drm/i915: move clock_gating_funcs
> >>> to display.funcs
> >>>
> >>> Move display related members under drm_i915_private display sub-
> struct.
> >>>
> >>> Rename struct i915_clock_gating_funcs to intel_clock_gating_funcs
> >>> while at it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 4 ++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 --
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 58 +++++++++----------
> >>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> >>> index ff76bd4079e4..98c6ccdc9100 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> >>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >>>
> >>> struct intel_atomic_state;
> >>> struct intel_cdclk_funcs;
> >>> +struct intel_clock_gating_funcs;
> >>> struct intel_crtc;
> >>> struct intel_crtc_state;
> >>> struct intel_dpll_funcs;
> >>> @@ -44,6 +45,9 @@ struct intel_display {
> >>>
> >>> /* irq display functions */
> >>> const struct intel_hotplug_funcs *hotplug;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* pm private clock gating functions */
> >>> + const struct intel_clock_gating_funcs *clock_gating;
> >> Likewise having struct intel_display and all display related structs inside
> this, can this stuct be moved to intel_pm?
> >> This is more related to a pm!
> >
> > I'm undecided whether it's eventually better to group the functions
> > together, or spread the functions by, uh, functionality.
> >
> > But I'm pretty sure I want to first group them like this, see how the
> > *other* named and anonymous sub-structs of intel_display shape up, and
> > spread them around if that feels like the right thing to do.
>
> Also, this series is going to be a lot of refactoring, and I'm constantly trying to
> *not* incorporate too many changes, and mostly just stick to straightforward
> movement. There's a lot more that should be done wrt actually hiding this
> stuff within modules (using opaque pointers etc) instead of exposing all of
> the data to all of the drivers. It just can't all be done at once. This is the first
> step.
>
Can we have a TODO, so that we don't miss this and it would be on track?
Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
