Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix NPD in PMU during driver teardown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/08/2022 00:03, Stuart Summers wrote:
In the driver teardown, we are unregistering the gt prior
to unregistering the PMU. This means there is a small window
of time in which the application can request metrics from the
PMU, some of which are calling into the uapi engines list,
while the engines are not available. In this case we can
see null pointer dereferences.

Fix this ordering in both the driver load and unload sequences.

v1: Actually address the driver load/unload ordering issue
v2: Remove the NULL checks since they shouldn't be necessary
     now with the proper ordering

Fixes: 42014f69bb235 ("drm/i915: Hook up GT power management")

What happened in this commit to break it?

Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 11 ++++++-----
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
index deb8a8b76965a..ee4dcb85d2060 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
@@ -717,7 +717,6 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
i915_gem_driver_register(dev_priv);
-	i915_pmu_register(dev_priv);
intel_vgpu_register(dev_priv); @@ -731,11 +730,12 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	i915_debugfs_register(dev_priv);
  	i915_setup_sysfs(dev_priv);
+ intel_gt_driver_register(to_gt(dev_priv));
+
  	/* Depends on sysfs having been initialized */
+	i915_pmu_register(dev_priv);
  	i915_perf_register(dev_priv);
- intel_gt_driver_register(to_gt(dev_priv));
-

There was a bit of a time distance since we originally discussed this so things kind of evaporated from my head. Or at least it feels like that. Today when I look at the code I don't understand why is this shuffle relevant.

The sysfs comment does not really apply to pmu, but also if I look into intel_gt_driver_(un)register I did not spot what is the relevant part which interacts with the PMU.

On register it is engine list first then PMU.

On unregister it is PMU first, then engine list:

  i915_driver_remove
    i915_driver_unregister
      i915_pmu_unregister
    i915_gem_driver_remove
      clears uabi engines list

Help please? :)

Regards,

Tvrtko

  	intel_display_driver_register(dev_priv);
intel_power_domains_enable(dev_priv);
@@ -762,11 +762,12 @@ static void i915_driver_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_display_driver_unregister(dev_priv); - intel_gt_driver_unregister(to_gt(dev_priv));
-
  	i915_perf_unregister(dev_priv);
+	/* GT should be available until PMU is gone */
  	i915_pmu_unregister(dev_priv);
+ intel_gt_driver_unregister(to_gt(dev_priv));
+
  	i915_teardown_sysfs(dev_priv);
  	drm_dev_unplug(&dev_priv->drm);



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux