> -----Original Message----- > From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:31 PM > To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Murthy, Arun R > <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel > backlight > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique > > backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight > > but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight > > device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different > > name it leads to failure logs in dmesg inturn getting caught by CI. > > > > This patch alternately will check if the backlight class of same name > > exists, will use a different name. > > > > v2: reworked on top of the patch 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: > > use unique backlight device names") > > > > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > > index 110fc98ec280..1e550d048e86 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c > > @@ -971,26 +971,22 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct > intel_connector *connector) > > if (!name) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > - bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, > connector, > > - &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props); > > - > > - /* > > - * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector > > - * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the > > - * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward > > - * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices > as a > > - * fallback when the default name already exists. > > - */ > > - if (IS_ERR(bd) && PTR_ERR(bd) == -EEXIST) { > > + if (backlight_device_get_by_name(name)) { > > This leaks a reference count to the backlight device. It needs to be something > like: > > bd = backlight_device_get_by_name(name); > if (bd) { > put_device(&bd->dev); > > /* ... */ > } Thanks, Corrected and sent a revised version on patch! Thanks and Regards. Arun R Murthy --------------------