Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: revert "return only unsignaled fences in dma_fence_unwrap_for_each v3"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Karolina,

Am 12.07.22 um 14:04 schrieb Karolina Drobnik:
Hi Christian,

On 12.07.2022 12:28, Christian König wrote:
This reverts commit 8f61973718485f3e89bc4f408f929048b7b47c83.

It turned out that this is not correct. Especially the sync_file info
IOCTL needs to see even signaled fences to correctly report back their
status to userspace.

Instead add the filter in the merge function again where it makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

After applying the patch, fence merging works and all sw_sync subtests are passing. Thanks for taking care of this.

Tested-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolina.drobnik@xxxxxxxxx>

can anybody give me an rb or at least an Acked-by as well so that I can push this upstream?

Thanks,
Christian.


---
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c | 3 ++-
  include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h   | 6 +-----
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c
index 502a65ea6d44..7002bca792ff 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ struct dma_fence *__dma_fence_unwrap_merge(unsigned int num_fences,
      count = 0;
      for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i) {
          dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(tmp, &iter[i], fences[i])
-            ++count;
+            if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(tmp))
+                ++count;
      }
        if (count == 0)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
index 390de1ee9d35..66b1e56fbb81 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
@@ -43,14 +43,10 @@ struct dma_fence *dma_fence_unwrap_next(struct dma_fence_unwrap *cursor);    * Unwrap dma_fence_chain and dma_fence_array containers and deep dive into all    * potential fences in them. If @head is just a normal fence only that one is
   * returned.
- *
- * Note that signalled fences are opportunistically filtered out, which
- * means the iteration is potentially over no fence at all.
   */
  #define dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, cursor, head)            \
      for (fence = dma_fence_unwrap_first(head, cursor); fence;    \
-         fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(cursor))            \
-        if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
+         fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(cursor))
    struct dma_fence *__dma_fence_unwrap_merge(unsigned int num_fences,
                         struct dma_fence **fences,




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux