On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:55:57PM +0000, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ville
> > Syrjala
> > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 8:36 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Nuke PCH_JSP
> >
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > JSP is based on ICP and we don't really need to differentiate between the
> > two. So let's just delcare JSP to be ICP.
> >
> > The only slight change here is for Wa_14011294188 which we used to apply
> > for JSP but now we'll only apply to MCC. This should be fine since the issue
> > being dealt with was introduced in TGP and inherited into MCC. JSP being
> > derived from ICP should not need this workaround.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 3 ++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h | 4 +---
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > index a9cb27f1c964..589af257edeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
> >
> > /* Wa_14011294188:ehl,jsl,tgl,rkl,adl-s */
> > - if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_JSP &&
> > + if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_TGP &&
> > INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) < PCH_DG1)
> > intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D, 0,
> > PCH_DPMGUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE); diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> > index b45c504c6f03..0fec25be146a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> > @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ intel_pch_type(const struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv, unsigned short id)
> > case INTEL_PCH_JSP_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
> > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Found Jasper Lake PCH\n");
> > drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv));
> > - return PCH_JSP;
> > + /* JSP is ICP compatible */
> > + return PCH_ICP;
> > case INTEL_PCH_ADP_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
> > case INTEL_PCH_ADP2_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
> > case INTEL_PCH_ADP3_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> > index 07f6f5517968..7c8ce9781d1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> > @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ enum intel_pch {
> > PCH_LPT, /* Lynxpoint/Wildcatpoint PCH */
> > PCH_SPT, /* Sunrisepoint/Kaby Lake PCH */
> > PCH_CNP, /* Cannon/Comet Lake PCH */
> > - PCH_ICP, /* Ice Lake PCH */
> > - PCH_JSP, /* Jasper Lake PCH */
> > + PCH_ICP, /* Ice Lake/Jasper Lake PCH */
>
> Only in i915_irq icp is used and in the rest of the i915 code icl is used leading to confusion.
> I would rather suggest to use ICL since most of the driver references it as icl and also change icp in i915_irq to icl.
> This is just my opinion, other can comment over here.
ICL is a CPU, ICP is a PCH.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
