Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove __dma_fence_is_chain()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 29.06.22 um 01:35 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

drive-by cleanup

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

We should probably completely remove that dependency and rather use dma_fence_unwrap instead.

But that's probably for another patch Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>.

Christian.


---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
index 319936f91ac5..667841780514 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
@@ -73,11 +73,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
  	rcu_read_unlock();
  }
-static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
-{
-	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
-}
-
  void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
  				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
  {
@@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
  			fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
-	} else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
+	} else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
  		struct dma_fence *iter;
/* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux