Am 29.06.22 um 01:35 schrieb Rob Clark:
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
drive-by cleanup
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
We should probably completely remove that dependency and rather use
dma_fence_unwrap instead.
But that's probably for another patch Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>.
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
index 319936f91ac5..667841780514 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
@@ -73,11 +73,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
-{
- return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
-}
-
void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
{
@@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
- } else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
+ } else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
struct dma_fence *iter;
/* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */
