On 28/06/2022 11:24, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote:
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@xxxxxxxxx>
However, the use after free build issue did not occur only with the "$
meson build && ninja -C build" build command guided by the igt
README.md. How did you check it?
Hmm, I assume it's just a difference in compiler version or so. I have:
gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220507 (Red Hat 12.1.1-1).
Br,
G.G.
On 6/27/22 7:10 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:277:20: warning: pointer ‘ctx’ used after
‘free’ [-Wuse-after-free]
277 | igt_assert(igt_sysfs_printf(ctx->debugfs,
"i915_drop_caches",
../lib/igt_core.h:667:20: note: in definition of macro ‘igt_assert’
667 | do { if (!(expr)) \
| ^~~~
../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:274:9: note: call to ‘free’ here
274 | free(ctx);
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_eio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
index 913a21f9..6cbae6eb 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c
@@ -270,11 +270,11 @@ static void hang_handler(union sigval arg)
igt_nsec_elapsed(&ctx->delay) / 1000.0);
igt_assert_eq(timer_delete(ctx->timer), 0);
- free(ctx);
/* flush any excess work before we start timing our reset */
igt_assert(igt_sysfs_printf(ctx->debugfs, "i915_drop_caches",
"%d", DROP_RCU));
+ free(ctx);
igt_nsec_elapsed(ts);
igt_assert(igt_sysfs_printf(dir, "i915_wedged", "%llu", -1ull));
