>-----Original Message----- >From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of >Christian König >Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 5:55 AM >To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: matthew.william.auld@xxxxxxxxx; Christian König ><christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [PATCH 04/11] drm/ttm: move default BO destructor into VMWGFX > >It's the only driver using this. > >Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c >b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c >index 85a66014c2b6..c4f376d5e1d0 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c >@@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ int vmw_bo_create(struct vmw_private *vmw, > return -ENOMEM; > } > >+ if (!bo_free) >+ bo_free = vmw_bo_default_destroy; >+ vmw_bo_init has a WARN_ON if this is NULL. Also, all of the callers use vmw_bo_bo_free() or vmw_gem_destroy(). Both of those unmap, release and then free the object. It doesn't look like vmw_bo_default_destroy does this work. Is this the right "default" path? Or should the WARN_ON be used to check for this? M > ret = vmw_bo_init(vmw, *p_bo, size, > placement, interruptible, pin, > bo_free); >-- >2.25.1
