On Wed, 18 May 2022, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:05:46PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> >> On 4/5/22 08:15, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> >> > >> > Fix: >> > >> > In file included from <command-line>:0:0: >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c: In function ‘intel_guc_send_mmio’: >> > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:352:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1047’ \ >> > declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: mask is not constant >> > _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) >> > >> > and other build errors due to shift overflowing values. >> > >> > See https://lore.kernel.org/r/YkwQ6%2BtIH8GQpuct@xxxxxxx for the gory >> > details as to why it triggers with older gccs only. >> > >> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Is this merged anywhere? > > It's state is "new" in their patchwork: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/480756/ Basically we run all patches through CI before merging, and because only one patch was sent to intel-gfx, the CI just sat waiting for the rest of the series to arrive... Anyway, didn't really like the changes in i915_reg.h, sent my version of that and the rest separately [1]. > so I guess not yet. > >> It could/should at least be in linux-next so that other people >> don't waste time on it. > > -ETOOMANYPATCHES I guess. :-\ Yeah, sorry about that. BR, Jani. [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104122/ -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
