On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:17:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming > > cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve > > performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a > > problem elsewhere. > > > > In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from > > this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not > > using it is the special case for MOCS. > > > > References: http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf (page 57) > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> > > Iris is the marketing name and likely to stick around for a bit (like HD > Graphics), I'd vote to use the codename for this thing here, i.e. crw. > -Daniel > I think we've agreed on IRC to leave this as is? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
