Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Don't show engine information in fdinfo with GuC submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15/04/2022 01:25, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
At present i915 does not fetch busyness information from GuC, resulting in
incorrect busyness values in fdinfo. Because engine information is coupled
with busyness in fdinfo, skip showing client engine information in fdinfo
with GuC submission till fetching busyness is supported in the i915 GuC
submission backend.

v2 (Daniele):
   Make commit title and description more precise
   Add FIXME with brief description at code change
   s/intel_guc_submission_is_used/intel_uc_uses_guc_submission/

v3 (Daniele):
   Drop FIXME in comment

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5564
Fixes: 055634e4b62f ("drm/i915: Expose client engine utilisation via fdinfo")
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c | 6 +++++-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
index e539f6b23060..475a6f824cad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
@@ -145,7 +145,11 @@ void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
  		   PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
  	seq_printf(m, "drm-client-id:\t%u\n", client->id);
- if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 8)
+	/*
+	 * Temporarily skip showing client engine information with GuC submission till
+	 * fetching engine busyness is implemented in the GuC submission backend
+	 */
+	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 8 || intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&i915->gt0.uc))
  		return;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_class_names); i++)

Thanks for fixing this while I was away. It was a simple miss, nothing sinister. In terms of mention of "garbage" numbers being reported - were they actually garbage or simply always zero?

Regards,

Tvrtko



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux