On 4/20/22 12:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 08:04:31AM +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote: >> Hi folks: >> >> Here is the PR of gvt-next. >> >> Mostly it includes the patch bundle of GVT-g re-factor patches for adapting the GVT-g with the >> new MDEV interfaces: >> >> - Separating the MMIO table from GVT-g. (Zhi) >> - GVT-g re-factor. (Christoph) >> - GVT-g mdev API cleanup. (Jason) >> - GVT-g trace/makefile cleanup. (Jani) >> >> Thanks so much for making this happen. >> >> This PR has been tested as following and no problem shows up: >> >> $dim update-branches >> $dim apply-pull drm-intel-next < this_email.eml >> >> The following changes since commit b39d2c6202426b560641e5800c5523851b5db586: >> >> drm/i915/fbc: Call intel_fbc_activate() directly from frontbuffer flush (2022-04-13 17:20:49 +0300) > > ?? > > Why did you rebase this again? It needs to be on a rc release tag as > you had in your github, not whatever this is. > Hi Jason: Here is what I understand, the pull going to the drm-intel-next needs to be based on drm-intel-next from the branch gvt-next. The pull going to the VFIO needs to be based on -rc, the topic/for-christoph brnach. So I did a merge from topic/for-christoph to my gvt-next branch and sent this pull, so that our QA can test these bundle on the gvt-staging branch. Sorry this is way too complicated to me. Let me prepare the new pull as what you ask. Shall I send the exact same pull to i915 and VFIO ? Thanks, Zhi. > Jason >
