Hi,
On 4/12/22 21:38, Robert Beckett wrote:
+struct ttm_resource *
+i915_gem_stolen_reserve_range(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ resource_size_t size,
+ u64 start, u64 end)
{
- int ret;
+ struct intel_memory_region *mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
- if (!drm_mm_initialized(&i915->mm.stolen))
- return -ENODEV;
-
- /* WaSkipStolenMemoryFirstPage:bdw+ */
- if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 8 && start < 4096)
- start = 4096;
Did we lose this Workaround?
Need to continue reviewing this patchnext week.
Thx,
Thomas
-
- mutex_lock(&i915->mm.stolen_lock);
- ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&i915->mm.stolen, node,
- size, alignment, 0,
- start, end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST);
- mutex_unlock(&i915->mm.stolen_lock);
+ if (!mem)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ return intel_region_ttm_resource_alloc(mem, size, start, end, I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+}
-
