Hello, Can anyone review please? Pre-merge failure is not related to the patch. Thanks, Tejas > -----Original Message----- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 13 April 2022 16:28 > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/adl-n: Differentiate ADLP and ADLN steppings > > ADL-N and ADL-P stepping are different, thus we need to add check for ADL- > N in IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(). > > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 9274417cd87a..51f2a14b0dca > 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private > *i915, > IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until)) > > #define IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until) \ > - (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(__i915) && \ > + (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(__i915) && !IS_ADLP_N(__i915) &&\ > IS_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until)) > > #define IS_ADLP_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \ > -- > 2.34.1
