On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 07:53:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Modern VBTs no longer contain the LFP data table pointers > > block (41). We are expecting to have one in order to be able > > to parse the LFP data block (42), so let's make one up. > > > > Since the fp_timing table has variable size we must somehow > > determine its size. Rather than just hardcode it we look for > > the terminator bytes (0xffff) to figure out where each table > > entry starts. dvo_timing, panel_pnp_id, and panel_name are > > expected to have fixed size. > > > > This has been observed on various machines, eg. TGL with BDB > > version 240, CML with BDB version 231, etc. The most recent > > VBT I've observed that still had block 41 had BDB version > > 228. So presumably the cutoff (if an exact cutoff even exists) > > is somewhere around BDB version 229-231. > > > > v2: kfree the thing we allocated, not the thing+3 bytes > > v3: Do the debugprint only if we found the LFP data block > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > > index 8b118c54314d..d32091dad1b0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > > @@ -310,16 +310,146 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block) > > return validate_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, ptrs); > > } > > > > +static const void *find_fp_timing_terminator(const u8 *data, int size) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + if (!data) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < size - 1; i++) { > > + if (data[i] == 0xff && data[i+1] == 0xff) > > + return &data[i]; > > + } > > + > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > +static int make_lfp_data_ptr(struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *table, > > + int table_size, int total_size) > > +{ > > + if (total_size < table_size) > > + return total_size; > > + > > + table->table_size = table_size; > > + table->offset = total_size - table_size; > > + > > + return total_size - table_size; > > +} > > + > > +static void next_lfp_data_ptr(struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *next, > > + const struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table *prev, > > + int size) > > +{ > > + next->table_size = prev->table_size; > > + next->offset = prev->offset + size; > > +} > > + > > +static void *generate_lfp_data_ptrs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > > + const void *bdb) > > +{ > > + int i, size, table_size, block_size, offset; > > + const void *t0, *t1, *block; > > + struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs; > > + void *ptrs_block; > > + > > + block = find_raw_section(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA); > > + if (!block) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Generating LFP data table pointers\n"); > > + > > + block_size = get_blocksize(block); > > + > > + size = block_size; > > + t0 = find_fp_timing_terminator(block, size); > > + > > + size -= t0 - block - 2; > > + t1 = find_fp_timing_terminator(t0 + 2, size); > > Need to NULL check t0 before using it. I had the null check in find_fp_timing_terminator() but the +2 here does mean that it doesn't actually work. I'll move the check here. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel