Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm/edid: split drm_edid_block_valid() to check and act parts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 07:49:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> -
> >> -		if (edid->revision > 4)
> >> -			DRM_DEBUG("EDID minor > 4, assuming backward compatibility\n");
> >
> > This debug message seems to disappear. Intentional?
> 
> Intentional, but failed to mention it in the commit message.
> 
> Do we want to keep it? With my new approach, it basically means another
> valid return value that's distinct from just ok.

Seems pretty pointless to me. Especially with DisplayID on the
scene it seems rather unlikely that there would ever be EDID 1.5+.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux