Hi, On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 18:21 +0000, Bloomfield, Jon wrote: > +@Vetter, Daniel > > Let's not start re-inventing this on the fly again. That's how we got > into trouble in the past. The SAS/Whitepaper does currently require > the SMEM+LMEM placement for mappable, for good reasons. Just to avoid any misunderstandings here: We have two hard requirements from Arch that clash, main problem is compressed bos can't be captured on error with current designs.
