From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Eliminate the weird inverted logic from the rps new_delay comparison.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 611da3a..62f8b2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -707,8 +707,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* sysfs frequency interfaces may have snuck in while servicing the
* interrupt
*/
- if (!(new_delay > dev_priv->rps.max_delay ||
- new_delay < dev_priv->rps.min_delay)) {
+ if (new_delay >= dev_priv->rps.min_delay &&
+ new_delay <= dev_priv->rps.max_delay) {
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, new_delay);
else
--
1.8.1.5
