On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:35:59PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:00:28PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Replace the hardcoded 2 pipe assumptions when we're massaging
> > > pipe_mode and the pipe_src rect to be suitable for bigjoiner.
> > > Instead we can just count the number of pipes in the bitmask.
> > >
> > > v2: Introduce intel_bigjoiner_num_pipes()
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > index 9b4013ed3d98..7a09bb33c1eb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > crtc->pipe == bigjoiner_master_pipe(crtc_state);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int intel_bigjoiner_num_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > +{
> > > + return hweight8(crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes);
> > > +}
> >
> > Okay yes makes sense. Although bigjoiner will always be between just 2 pipes so why not hardcode to 2 and
> > use the if (!crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) as the check instead of num_pipes < 2.
> > When we have a joiner for 4 pipes, in that case also bigjoiner will still be only between 2 pipes.
> > So in bigjoiner_pipe mask, it will always only have 2 pipes.
>
> It'll be whatever pipes we have when we have more pipes.
Okay agreed might be good from scalability pov
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
Manasi
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
