On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:13:35AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 05:30:55PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > With some VRR panels, user can turn VRR ON/OFF on the fly from the panel settings.
> > When VRR is turned OFF ,sends a long HPD to the driver clearing the Ignore MSA bit
> > in the DPCD. Currently the driver parses that onevery HPD but fails to reset
> > the corresponding VRR Capable Connector property.
> > Hence the userspace still sees this as VRR Capable panel which is incorrect.
> >
> > Fix this by explicitly resetting the connector property.
> >
> > v2: Reset vrr capable if status == connector_disconnected
> > v3: Use i915 and use bool vrr_capable (Jani Nikula)
> > v4: Move vrr_capable to after update modes call (Jani N)
> > Remove the redundant comment (Jan N)
> > v5: Fixes the regression on older platforms by reseting the VRR
> > only if HAS_VRR
> > v6: Remove the checks from driver, add in drm core before
> > setting VRR prop (Ville)
> >
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 390a1f8beb87 ("Revert "drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd")
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 1046e7fe310a..f96123b56935 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -4455,6 +4455,10 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > memset(&intel_dp->compliance, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->compliance));
> > memset(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd));
> >
> > + /* Reset VRR Capable property on disconnect */
> > + drm_connector_set_vrr_capable_property(connector,
> > + false);
> > +
> > if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > "MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> > @@ -4569,15 +4573,18 @@ static int intel_dp_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> > {
> > struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> > struct edid *edid;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->dev);
> > int num_modes = 0;
> >
> > edid = intel_connector->detect_edid;
> > if (edid) {
> > - num_modes = intel_connector_update_modes(connector, edid);
> > + bool vrr_capable;
> >
> > - if (intel_vrr_is_capable(connector))
> > - drm_connector_set_vrr_capable_property(connector,
> > - true);
> > + num_modes = intel_connector_update_modes(connector, edid);
> > + vrr_capable = intel_vrr_is_capable(connector);
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] VRR capable: %s\n",
> > + connector->base.id, connector->name, yesno(vrr_capable));
> > + drm_connector_set_vrr_capable_property(connector, vrr_capable);
>
> As mentioned on irc I think intel_dp_(un)set_edid() would be a better
> place for these.
Yes I guess I can add the above to check for vrr_capable and set it to true/false in intel_dp_set_edid()
But the resetting part needs to happen outside of intel_dp_unset_edid so that we dont always set it to false
before set_edid. It can just stay in intel_dp_detect where we clear other othing on connect status == disconnected.
Is that fine?
Manasi
>
> > }
> >
> > /* Also add fixed mode, which may or may not be present in EDID */
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
