Re-reported after addressing all the failures. See below for bug id's. -----Original Message----- From: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 8:05 AM To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Do not try loading wrong DMC version On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 08:47:05AM +0000, Patchwork wrote: >== Series Details == > >Series: drm/i915/dmc: Do not try loading wrong DMC version >URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100664/ >State : failure > >== Summary == > >CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11279_full -> Patchwork_22393_full >==================================================== > >Summary >------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22393_full absolutely > need to be verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_22393_full, please notify your bug team to > allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > >Participating hosts (11 -> 11) >------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > >Possible new issues >------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22393_full: > >### IGT changes ### > >#### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: > - shard-skl: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/shard-skl8/igt@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22393/shard-skl6/ig > t@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Lakshmi: This is related to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4843 igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend - incomplete - PM: suspend entry (deep) > * igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@a-hdmi-a1: > - shard-glk: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/shard-glk1/igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22393/shard-glk8/ig > t@kms_flip@busy-flip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx this could only be a regression if it was in another display_ver == 12. Those are not. Lakshmi: This is related to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4628 igt@kms_flip@busy-flip@.* - fail - Failed assertion: do_page_flip(o, new_fb_id, 0) == -16,error: 0 != -16 > > >#### Warnings #### > > * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation: > - shard-skl: [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) -> [INCOMPLETE][6] > [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/shard-skl10/igt@i915_pm_dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22393/shard-skl6/ig > t@i915_pm_dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >#### Suppressed #### > > The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. > They do not affect the overall result. > > * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend@pipe-b-planes: > - {shard-tglu}: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][7] +1 similar issue > [7]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22393/shard-tglu-1/ > igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx this one woruld be suspicious, but the DMC issue there is caused by an earlier error. Checking another run for this same machine, both are loading the same DMC: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11276/shard-tglu-1/boot9.txt <7>[ 6.100322] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_dmc_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin <7>[ 6.101182] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_fbc_init [i915]] Sanitized enable_fbc value: 1 <7>[ 6.102264] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM0 latency 3 (3.0 usec) <7>[ 6.102480] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM1 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <7>[ 6.102592] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM2 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <7>[ 6.102712] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM3 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <7>[ 6.102820] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM4 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <7>[ 6.102977] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM5 latency 73 (73.0 usec) <7>[ 6.103040] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM6 latency 110 (110.0 usec) <7>[ 6.103176] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM7 latency 115 (115.0 usec) <6>[ 6.104018] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin (v2.12) and https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22393/shard-tglu-1/boot16.txt <7>[ 6.108031] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_dmc_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin <7>[ 6.109333] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_fbc_init [i915]] Sanitized enable_fbc value: 1 <7>[ 6.110644] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM0 latency 3 (3.0 usec) <7>[ 6.111192] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM1 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <7>[ 6.111311] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM2 latency 54 (54.0 usec) <6>[ 6.111481] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin (v2.12) <7>[ 6.111479] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] Gen9 Plane WM3 latency 54 (54.0 usec Can't be caused by this series. Lakshmi: This is related to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5122 Few tests - dmesg-warn/incomplete - i915 raw-wakerefs=1 wakelocks=1 on cleanup, WARNING: .* at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c:\d+ intel_runtime_pm_driver_release Lucas De Marchi
