Filed two new issues https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5162 igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-dual - incomplete - No logs https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5161 igt@gem_mmap_gtt@fault-concurrent-x - incomplete - unhandled error in i915_error_to_vmf_fault: -105 #5161 looks like a new issue but yet to happen on post-merge. Thanks, Lakshmi. -----Original Message----- From: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2022 10:46 AM To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/guc: Refactor ADS access to use iosys_map (rev4) On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 12:47:31PM +0000, Patchwork wrote: >== Series Details == > >Series: drm/i915/guc: Refactor ADS access to use iosys_map (rev4) >URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99711/ >State : failure > >== Summary == > >CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11250_full -> Patchwork_22334_full >==================================================== > >Summary >------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22334_full absolutely > need to be verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_22334_full, please notify your bug team to > allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > >Participating hosts (13 -> 13) >------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > >Possible new issues >------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22334_full: > >### IGT changes ### > >#### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-dual: > - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11250/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22334/shard-tglb6/i > gt@gem_exec_balancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <7>[ 7.738070] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_uc_init_early [i915]] enable_guc=0 (guc:no submission:no huc:no slpc:no) > > * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@fault-concurrent-x: > - shard-snb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11250/shard-snb4/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22334/shard-snb6/ig > t@gem_mmap_gtt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <7>[ 4.614922] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_uc_init_early [i915]] enable_guc=0 (guc:no submission:no huc:no slpc:no) anything in this series can only change the behavior when using guc, so these failures can't be related to this series. Lucas De Marchi
