On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:11:24PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
From: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> A portion of device memory is reserved for Flat CCS so usable device memory will be reduced by size of Flat CCS. Size of Flat CCS is specified in “XEHPSDV_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR”. So to get effective device memory we need to subtract total device memory by Flat CCS memory size. v2: Addressed the small bar related issue [Matt] Removed a reduntant check [Matt] Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c index f59933abbb3a..e40d98cb3a2d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c @@ -911,6 +911,25 @@ u32 intel_gt_read_register_fw(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg) return intel_uncore_read_fw(gt->uncore, reg); } +u32 intel_gt_read_register(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg) +{ + int type; + u8 sliceid, subsliceid; + + for (type = 0; type < NUM_STEERING_TYPES; type++) { + if (intel_gt_reg_needs_read_steering(gt, reg, type)) { + intel_gt_get_valid_steering(gt, type, &sliceid, + &subsliceid); + return intel_uncore_read_with_mcr_steering(gt->uncore, + reg, + sliceid, + subsliceid); + } + } + + return intel_uncore_read(gt->uncore, reg); +} + void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info, struct drm_printer *p) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h index 2dad46c3eff2..0f571c8ee22b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static inline bool intel_gt_needs_read_steering(struct intel_gt *gt, } u32 intel_gt_read_register_fw(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg); +u32 intel_gt_read_register(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg); void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info, struct drm_printer *p); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c index 21215a080088..f1d37b46b505 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c @@ -205,8 +205,28 @@ static struct intel_memory_region *setup_lmem(struct intel_gt *gt) if (!IS_DGFX(i915)) return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); - /* Stolen starts from GSMBASE on DG1 */ - lmem_size = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, GEN12_GSMBASE); + if (HAS_FLAT_CCS(i915)) { + u64 tile_stolen, flat_ccs_base_addr_reg, flat_ccs_base; + + lmem_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 2); + flat_ccs_base_addr_reg = intel_gt_read_register(gt, XEHPSDV_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR);
nit since this will need a respin due to conflicts: we usually call _reg an i915_reg_t variable. But here you have the value, not the register. Maybe "flat_ccs_base_addr"?
+ flat_ccs_base = (flat_ccs_base_addr_reg >> XEHPSDV_CCS_BASE_SHIFT) * SZ_64K; + + if (GEM_WARN_ON(lmem_size < flat_ccs_base)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + + tile_stolen = lmem_size - flat_ccs_base; + + /* If the FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR register is not populated, flag an error */ + if (tile_stolen == lmem_size) + DRM_ERROR("CCS_BASE_ADDR register did not have expected value\n");
drm_err()
+ + lmem_size -= tile_stolen; + } else { + /* Stolen starts from GSMBASE without CCS */ + lmem_size = intel_uncore_read64(&i915->uncore, GEN12_GSMBASE); + } + io_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, 2); if (GEM_WARN_ON(lmem_size > pci_resource_len(pdev, 2))) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 0f36af8dc3a1..9b5423572fe9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -11651,6 +11651,9 @@ enum skl_power_gate { #define SGGI_DIS REG_BIT(15) #define SGR_DIS REG_BIT(13) +#define XEHPSDV_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR _MMIO(0x4910) +#define XEHPSDV_CCS_BASE_SHIFT 8 +
you will have a conflict here... I fixed it locally by moving to gt/intel_gt_regs.h With the above, Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Lucas De Marchi
/* gamt regs */ #define GEN8_L3_LRA_1_GPGPU _MMIO(0x4dd4) #define GEN8_L3_LRA_1_GPGPU_DEFAULT_VALUE_BDW 0x67F1427F /* max/min for LRA1/2 */ -- 2.20.1