On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 08:24:04AM +0100, Christian König wrote: > Am 26.01.22 um 21:36 schrieb Lucas De Marchi: > > In certain situations it's useful to be able to read or write to an > > offset that is calculated by having the memory layout given by a struct > > declaration. Usually we are going to read/write a u8, u16, u32 or u64. > > > > Add a pair of macros dma_buf_map_read_field()/dma_buf_map_write_field() > > to calculate the offset of a struct member and memcpy the data from/to > > the dma_buf_map. We could use readb, readw, readl, readq and the write* > > counterparts, however due to alignment issues this may not work on all > > architectures. If alignment needs to be checked to call the right > > function, it's not possible to decide at compile-time which function to > > call: so just leave the decision to the memcpy function that will do > > exactly that on IO memory or dereference the pointer. > > > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h > > index 19fa0b5ae5ec..65e927d9ce33 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > > #ifndef __DMA_BUF_MAP_H__ > > #define __DMA_BUF_MAP_H__ > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > #include <linux/io.h> > > #include <linux/string.h> > > @@ -229,6 +230,46 @@ static inline void dma_buf_map_clear(struct dma_buf_map *map) > > } > > } > > +/** > > + * dma_buf_map_memcpy_to_offset - Memcpy into offset of dma-buf mapping > > + * @dst: The dma-buf mapping structure > > + * @offset: The offset from which to copy > > + * @src: The source buffer > > + * @len: The number of byte in src > > + * > > + * Copies data into a dma-buf mapping with an offset. The source buffer is in > > + * system memory. Depending on the buffer's location, the helper picks the > > + * correct method of accessing the memory. > > + */ > > +static inline void dma_buf_map_memcpy_to_offset(struct dma_buf_map *dst, size_t offset, > > + const void *src, size_t len) > > +{ > > + if (dst->is_iomem) > > + memcpy_toio(dst->vaddr_iomem + offset, src, len); > > + else > > + memcpy(dst->vaddr + offset, src, len); > > +} > > + > > +/** > > + * dma_buf_map_memcpy_from_offset - Memcpy from offset of dma-buf mapping into system memory > > + * @dst: Destination in system memory > > + * @src: The dma-buf mapping structure > > + * @src: The offset from which to copy > > + * @len: The number of byte in src > > + * > > + * Copies data from a dma-buf mapping with an offset. The dest buffer is in > > + * system memory. Depending on the mapping location, the helper picks the > > + * correct method of accessing the memory. > > + */ > > +static inline void dma_buf_map_memcpy_from_offset(void *dst, const struct dma_buf_map *src, > > + size_t offset, size_t len) > > +{ > > + if (src->is_iomem) > > + memcpy_fromio(dst, src->vaddr_iomem + offset, len); > > + else > > + memcpy(dst, src->vaddr + offset, len); > > +} > > + > > Well that's certainly a valid use case, but I suggest to change the > implementation of the existing functions to call the new ones with offset=0. > > This way we only have one implementation. > Trivial - but agree with Christian that is a good cleanup. > > /** > > * dma_buf_map_memcpy_to - Memcpy into dma-buf mapping > > * @dst: The dma-buf mapping structure > > @@ -263,4 +304,44 @@ static inline void dma_buf_map_incr(struct dma_buf_map *map, size_t incr) > > map->vaddr += incr; > > } > > +/** > > + * dma_buf_map_read_field - Read struct member from dma-buf mapping with > > + * arbitrary size and handling un-aligned accesses > > + * > > + * @map__: The dma-buf mapping structure > > + * @type__: The struct to be used containing the field to read > > + * @field__: Member from struct we want to read > > + * > > + * Read a value from dma-buf mapping calculating the offset and size: this assumes > > + * the dma-buf mapping is aligned with a a struct type__. A single u8, u16, u32 > > + * or u64 can be read, based on the offset and size of type__.field__. > > + */ > > +#define dma_buf_map_read_field(map__, type__, field__) ({ \ > > + type__ *t__; \ > > + typeof(t__->field__) val__; \ > > + dma_buf_map_memcpy_from_offset(&val__, map__, offsetof(type__, field__), \ > > + sizeof(t__->field__)); \ > > + val__; \ > > +}) > > + > > +/** > > + * dma_buf_map_write_field - Write struct member to the dma-buf mapping with > > + * arbitrary size and handling un-aligned accesses > > + * > > + * @map__: The dma-buf mapping structure > > + * @type__: The struct to be used containing the field to write > > + * @field__: Member from struct we want to write > > + * @val__: Value to be written > > + * > > + * Write a value to the dma-buf mapping calculating the offset and size. > > + * A single u8, u16, u32 or u64 can be written based on the offset and size of > > + * type__.field__. > > + */ > > +#define dma_buf_map_write_field(map__, type__, field__, val__) ({ \ > > + type__ *t__; \ > > + typeof(t__->field__) val____ = val__; \ > > + dma_buf_map_memcpy_to_offset(map__, offsetof(type__, field__), \ > > + &val____, sizeof(t__->field__)); \ > > +}) > > + > > Uff well that absolutely looks like overkill to me. > Hold on... > That's a rather special use case as far as I can see and I think we should > only have this in the common framework if more than one driver is using it. > I disagree, this is rather elegant. The i915 can't be the *only* driver that defines a struct which describes the layout of a dma_buf object. IMO this base macro allows *all* other drivers to build on this write directly to fields in structures those drivers have defined. Patches later in this series do this for the GuC ads. Matt > Regards, > Christian. > > > #endif /* __DMA_BUF_MAP_H__ */ >