Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/fbc: Register per-crtc debugfs files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Expose FBC debugfs files for each crtc. These may or may not point
> > to the same FBC instance depending on the platform.
> >
> > We leave the old global debugfs files in place until
> > igt catches up to the new per-crtc approach.
> >
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > index 53c93387710c..eafd84e7f058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > @@ -1798,25 +1798,32 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops,
> >  			intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_set,
> >  			"%llu\n");
> >  
> > -static void intel_fbc_debugfs_add(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
> > +static void intel_fbc_debugfs_add(struct intel_fbc *fbc,
> > +				  struct dentry *parent)
> >  {
> > -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = fbc->i915;
> > -	struct drm_minor *minor = i915->drm.primary;
> > -
> > -	debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_status", 0444,
> > -			    minor->debugfs_root, fbc,
> > -			    &intel_fbc_debugfs_status_fops);
> > +	debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_status", 0444, parent,
> > +			    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_status_fops);
> >  
> >  	if (fbc->funcs->set_false_color)
> > -		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644,
> > -				    minor->debugfs_root, fbc,
> > -				    &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > +		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > +				    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void intel_fbc_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >  {
> > -	struct intel_fbc *fbc = i915->fbc[INTEL_FBC_A];
> > +	struct drm_minor *minor = i915->drm.primary;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > +	struct intel_fbc *fbc;
> >  
> > +	for_each_intel_crtc(&i915->drm, crtc) {
> > +		struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(crtc->base.primary);
> > +
> > +		if (plane->fbc)
> > +			intel_fbc_debugfs_add(plane->fbc, crtc->base.debugfs_entry);
> > +	}
> 
> I think the per-crtc debugfs files should be registered via
> intel_crtc_debugfs_add().

I supposs. Seems a bit more leaky as far as abstractions goes
though. It would make a lot more sense if crtcs could be
registered dynamically, but they can't. I'll respin anyway.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux