Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/11/2021 16:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
This is a revert of commits
    d67739268cf0e ("drm/i915/gt: Mark up the nested engine-pm timeline lock as irqsafe")
    6c69a45445af9 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark context->active_count as protected by timeline->mutex")

6dcb85a0ad99 ("drm/i915: Hold irq-off for the entire fake lock period") is very relevant as well.

The existing code leads to a different behaviour depending on whether
lockdep is enabled or not. Any following lock that is acquired without
disabling interrupts (but needs to) will not be noticed by lockdep.

Agreed this is not good.

This it not just a lockdep annotation but is used but an actual mutex_t
that is properly used as a lock but in case of __timeline_mark_lock()
lockdep is only told that it is acquired but no lock has been acquired.

It appears that its purpose is just satisfy the lockdep_assert_held()
check in intel_context_mark_active(). The other problem with disabling
interrupts is that on PREEMPT_RT interrupts are also disabled which
leads to problems for instance later during memory allocation.

Hmm commit message of d67739268cf0 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark up the nested engine-pm timeline lock as irqsafe") makes it sound like parking can run with interrupts disabled already. I mean outside of the irq disable hack in here.

I don't see it possible though, both due might_lock in intel_wakeref_put and GFP_NOWAIT in switch_to_kernel_context. So I will assume that commit message refers to an earlier state of the code base.

So the approach in this patch looks good to me.

Add a CONTEXT_IS_PARKED bit to intel_engine_cs and set_bit/clear_bit it
instead of mutex_acquire/mutex_release. Use test_bit in the two
identified spots which relied on the lockdep annotation.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |    3 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |    1
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c     |   38 +-------------------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h           |    3 +-
  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
@@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static inline void intel_context_enter(s
static inline void intel_context_mark_active(struct intel_context *ce)
  {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
+	lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&ce->timeline->mutex) ||
+		       test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags));
  	++ce->active_count;
  }
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct intel_context {
  #define CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY		9
  #define CONTEXT_GUC_INIT		10
  #define CONTEXT_PERMA_PIN		11
+#define CONTEXT_IS_PARKED		12

Pedantic comment is that semantics of the bit flag suggest it should be name CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, or along those lines. Since the flag gets clear as soon as the parking completes. I'd suggest doing that change for the self-documenting benefit.

Regards,

Tvrtko

struct {
  		u64 timeout_us;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
@@ -80,39 +80,6 @@ static int __engine_unpark(struct intel_
  	return 0;
  }
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
-
-static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	mutex_acquire(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, 2, 0, _THIS_IP_);
-
-	return flags;
-}
-
-static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
-				   unsigned long flags)
-{
-	mutex_release(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
-
-#else
-
-static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
-				   unsigned long flags)
-{
-}
-
-#endif /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) */
-
  static void duration(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
  {
  	struct i915_request *rq = to_request(fence);
@@ -159,7 +126,6 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
  {
  	struct intel_context *ce = engine->kernel_context;
  	struct i915_request *rq;
-	unsigned long flags;
  	bool result = true;
/*
@@ -214,7 +180,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
  	 * engine->wakeref.count, we may see the request completion and retire
  	 * it causing an underflow of the engine->wakeref.
  	 */
-	flags = __timeline_mark_lock(ce);
+	set_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags);
  	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->timeline->active_count) < 0);
rq = __i915_request_create(ce, GFP_NOWAIT);
@@ -246,7 +212,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
result = false;
  out_unlock:
-	__timeline_mark_unlock(ce, flags);
+	clear_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags);
  	return result;
  }
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
@@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ i915_request_timeline(const struct i915_
  {
  	/* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */
  	return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline,
-					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex));
+					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex) ||
+					 test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &rq->context->flags));
  }
static inline struct i915_gem_context *




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux